Saturday, May 3, 2008

Consciousness and Politics

Posted by JCE

***

Yesterday I listened to a broadcast on NPR discussing the "new" proposed Windfall Profit Tax announced by Ms. Clinton as her way of addressing the skyrocketing costs of fuel. The broadcast interviewed Joseph Thorndike, director of the Tax History Project at TaxAnalysts.com and he explained that this is not a new tax at all and is in fact a very bad idea. The problem being that it is a windfall profit tax...not profits. There is another sort of tax that has been used in the past during war time to both cover the costs of the war and alleviate the strain on the economy and that is the Excess Profits Tax. The excess profits tax goes back approximately 5 years and calculates the tax on the profits of oil companies. The windfall profits tax is, for all intents an purposes, a one time tax based on the current price per barrel of oil.

Although I cannot follow all the intricacies of the tax jargon, it struck me that if there are people out there that already know all of this and have analyzed it, why isn't Congress and/or our presidential hopefuls asking them for advice? Actually, what I would really love to know is why someone like Hillary Clinton did not already know this? She has a law degree, she has spent time in the White House and has done time in Congress. Ummm...?

For the record, Congress did try to pass an excess profits tax in 1991 but were unsuccessful and our current Commander in Chief does not favor such taxes so he has not approved of any such tax nor has he initiated efforts to reinstate it during this war.

I realized that tax talk is boring to the point of sleep inducing, but this serves as one example of the willful deceit that has gone on for the last 7 years (and longer) and will most likely continue. Commercialized media does little to nothing to help the situation and the average John Q. Public is left paying the price for not paying attention and for not fully researching every damn thing spouted by politicians. The part I truly do not understand is the need to lie. BGH asked me once, is it unreasonable to expect capitalism to have a conscience? I ask the same question about politicians - are they incapable of doing their job with a conscience?

You can listen to the NPR broadcast here.

***

Friday, May 2, 2008

Engineer's Guide to Cats

Posted by Pariahjane

Well, it's Friday and the weekend is almost here (finally!) I just received this link from a friend and thought it was incredibly clever and very, very funny.



I'm not exactly a huge fan of cats, mainly because I break into hives and can't breathe when I'm around them but these cats are hysterical. I couldn't tell if they engineer was making some of those cat sounds or if that was really a cat!

Hope you all enjoy!

Death, Burial and Gas Prices

Posted by BGH

~
My father passed away Saturday April 26, 2008, we buried him yesterday May 1, 2008.

This has been the hardest week of my life. I am 37yrs old and though I have loved and lost, experienced setbacks and frustration, even times in my life when I thought things were dire during all of those times I had Dad to lean on. He kept me strong, taught me how to persevere and made me who I am today.

As I am known to do, I have found a Dropkick Murphys lyric that applies directly to this sentiment. From Surrender:

I was at my weakest state
And you kept pushing me on
You gave me something to believe in
And it keeps me standing strong
These lessons that I've learned
These things I'll carry on
And when you're gone I'll honor you
Each day, however long

So, now today, as life goes on and we go about our daily business, I can't help but think of my Papa at every turn. It is my job to be the man and the parent that my father was to me, to my son.

As I drive down the road I notice the ridiculously elevated gas prices and think back to a recent conversation with my father, my son is in the car next to me and so the conversation starts...

"These prices are insane, not solely for the price of fuel but how it affects everything else, you know what Grandpa used to say.... "

We carry on.
----

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Winning PowerBall

Posted by Susan

I don't make it a habit to buy lottery tickets. If I think of it when I'm filling the tank, I may get a couple. I never win. Not even a lousy few bucks for matching the PowerBall.

I did win three whole dollars once a long time ago. The clerk was totally baffled because I wanted my three dollars instead of three tickets. Nope. I not only took the cash, I made my friends look at it and admire it.

I figure I have two dollars worth of fun trying to figure out what I'd do if I ever actually won.

Of course, the first thing you do is GET THE THING VERIFIED! Don't tell anyone just in case you really didn't win.

Once you decide on an annuity or cash payment, get a good financial planner and tax accountant. I want to have a pile of money big enough that I can live off the interest and never have to need a paycheck again. Always plan for the unexpected ~ like a recession. What if the interest rate goes down to 1%? 1% of $1 million is only $10 thousand. Keep in mind that's before taxes.

I'm thinking a cash payout of about $30 million so in "hard times" you'd still have $300,000 annually, probably $150,000 after taxes. Yeah. I could be pretty darned happy with that.

OK. Let's say I win the next jackpot.

After the government takes their cut off the top, that leaves $43.65 million. At 1% annually, that's $436,500. Yup, taxable. Cut it in half again to be $218,250 to spend.

I'm good with that. I would go into my office over the weekend, take the pictures out of my cube and leave my pass under my manager's phone with a short note.

Then I'd pay off my bills and my house so I'm free and clear. So the first year will be a little thinner than I'd like, but that's OK. I could "make do" for awhile.

My luxury spending would be to replace my 1992 Lumina. Nothing fancy, but something new and totally reliable. (Don't forget that taxes and insurance rates will go up accordingly!)

I would have the time to volunteer at UNICORN THEATRE because I've been working so much the past couple of years, I haven't been able to spend the time I really want to helping out.

Year two: I'd hire an assistant. Someone to do all those little things like grocery shopping, picking up dry cleaning and loading up on cat food. Maybe even scooping litter boxes.

I'd have extra to share with UNICORN THEATRE and NO MORE HOMELESS PETS IN KANSAS CITY and BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY and AIDS WALK KANSAS CITY.

There might even be time to sit and start working on the stack of books piling up in my library. I'd have time to give my critters the attention they deserve.

All this planning is a lot of work and I suspect this would be just the tip of the iceberg.

Maybe it's a good thing I won't win after all. I just don't have time to deal with all this!

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

From Ridiculous to Flat Out Ludicrous

Posted by JCE

***
For the record, I am not a staunch Obama supporter.

Now that that is out of the way, the latest news stories regarding his former minister have left me wondering just how much the good reverend was paid to make his retarded comments. Support him or don't support him, Barack Obama has never, not one time ever, shown any hint that he shares the views espoused by the reverend.

Quite frankly, I am embarrassed on behalf of every reasonably intelligent American that Obama has been forced by the media to defend himself against the view expressed by Mr. Wright. No clear thinking individual could listen to those views and think Mr. Obama supports them. If Mr. Wright is not being paid in an attempt to sabotage Mr. Obama's candidacy, then he is simply trying to grasp a moment of limelight and in doing so presents himself as batshit crazy. Let's face it: Statements of reason do not sell papers or increase ratings and Mr. Wright realizes he has a captive congregation sitting on the other side of the television or newspaper.

What he may not realize is the damage he is doing to his reputation, to his religion and to all religion in this country. I, for one would be thrilled to see all religions forced to shut down, but that would be neither fair nor reasonable. As it is, I am content to envision millions of Americans make a noise of disgust every time Mr. Wright is shown on the news and point to him as yet another example of religious nutjobs. Although to many of us, every religion is full of nutjobs at least Mr. Wright's ability to make a spectacle of himself keeps the other moderates on their guard to watch their own religious leaders for signs of fundieism.

So, keep on talking Mr. Wright - most of us aren't listening. Mr. Obama - you are not personally responsible for this man's insanity and while I may not have decided whether or not to vote for you, if I don't it won't be because of anything Mr. Wright said.
***

UK wants to ban kinky porn

Posted by Pariahjane

Thought police, anyone? It appears that the UK is intent on rushing through a bill that would ban violent or 'extreme' pornography.

According to the article, violent or extreme porn could be:

As defined by the new Criminal Justice Bill
An act which threatens or appears to threaten a person's life
An act which results in or appears to result in serious injury to a person's anus, breasts or genitals
An act which involves or appears to involve sexual interference with a human corpse
A person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal


First off, I can't take issue with the last two descriptions of extreme pornography and having a potential ban against such acts because a dead person or an animal can't really give consent to be a part of the sex act in the first place. One could argue that as long as everyone is acting in the movie than it would be ok. Yet the bill would still make it illegal since it has that nice little word appearing in it.

Secondly, what exactly is 'serious injury'. I'm sure there are some people who think that getting a bruise is a pretty serious injury. Who decides just how serious an injury must be to earn the label 'violent' or 'extreme'. I don't, for example, consider spanking in a sexual context to be violent or extreme but others may. So, who decides?

On a side note, if there is a porn movie in which someone 'seriously' injures another actor in the face but not the breasts, anus or genitals would that still be considered 'violent pornography' and thus be banned?

There are those who get sexual satisfaction out of rape fantasies or torture fantasies. Others get off by bondage or sadomasochism. The movies can be used as a sexual tool in the bedroom and whether we agree with their fetish or not, as long as they have permissive partners they should have a right to view this stuff.

But campaigners say the new law risks criminalising thousands of people
who use violent pornographic images as part of consensual sexual relationships.


People like Helen, who by day works in an office in the Midlands,
and enjoys being sexually submissive and occasionally watching pornography,
portrayed by actors, which could be banned under the new legislation.


Some people like it kinky and sometimes that kinkiness goes beyond a little spanking but as long as these people are performing these acts with consensual adults than I see no reason why they should not be allowed to continue. Of course, I realize that the bill is focusing on pornography and not necessarily what people do in the privacy of their own homes. Pornography is acting and actors get paid. The people performing these acts in adult movies are not being forced to do these things; they are paid for it.

This bill is just an attempt to control what people are watching. It's censorship, plain and simple. Just because the legislation was proposed with good intentions doesn't make those intentions right.

Five years ago Jane Longhurst, a teacher from Brighton, was murdered.
It later emerged her killer had been compulsively accessing websites such as
Club Dead and Rape Action, which contained images of women being abused and
violated.


One cannot blame pornography for one man's depraved act. There could be many consenting adults who watched the same movies as the murderer did but they did not go out and kill somebody. As Helen states:

"Mrs Longhurst sees this man having done this to her daughter and she
wants something to blame and rather than blame this psychotic man she wants to
change the law but she doesn't really understand the situation," says Helen. "Do
you ban alcohol just because some people are alcoholics?"


To be honest I would think that alcohol causes more societal problems than extreme pornography does.

Speaking from her home in Berkshire, Mrs Longhurst acknowledges that
libertarians see her as "a horrible killjoy".
"I'm not. I do not approve of this stuff but there is room for all sorts of different people. But anything which is going to cause damage to other people needs to be stopped."

To those who fear the legislation might criminalise people who use violent
pornography as a harmless sex aid, she responds with a blunt "hard luck".
"There is no reason for this stuff. I can't see why people need to see it.
People say what about our human rights but where are Jane's human rights?" (Emphasis added)


Now see, here's my problem with a bill such as this. Who gives Mrs. Longhurst the right to decide what others can and cannot view? There are many people in this world who use pornography to spice up their sex life and because Mrs. Longhurst doesn't like their tastes she feels it is within her right to have it banned.

I understand that perhaps there could be a darker element that is attracted to violent pornography but that does not give anyone the right to make it illegal for all the other consenting adults. Chances are there are many people just like you and me that get satisfaction from sex a little rougher than the average vanilla would prefer.

What next? Will pornography that contains sodomy be banned next? After all, sodomy could be considered an act which results in or appears to result in serious injury to a person's anus, breasts or genitals. The point is, people are going to jump on this and use it as a reason to make illegal other forms of pornography.

Making 'violent' pornography illegal is censorship. It is not there to protect the people. If it was then violent movies would be banned, as well as television or music that depicts violent acts. After all, how many murders have been the result of watching pornography?

Monday, April 28, 2008

Owen's Manicure

Posted by Susan

Seems that Walter Owen (he goes by his middle name) is ready for his manicure and a day at the spa.

Not bad considering that just 7 months ago he was a cold, wet and hungry stray crouched under a bush next to my patio.

Yup, he seems to have adjusted to the indoor life quite well!

Sunday, April 27, 2008

A little political humor

Posted by JCE

***
We've all been feeling a bit blah over here at The Information Paradox so to lighten the mood (in addition to Susan's excellent post about the 95 year old hero) I thought I would post some political humor cartoons:




Go Granny!

Posted by Susan

ARTICLE ON THE FOX23 NEWS WEBSITE CAN BE FOUND HERE

Here's one woman you don't want to mess with.

Even though the 95 year old woman is confined to a wheelchair, she protected herself and her home by stabbing a would-be intruder with a screwdriver every time he put his hand through her window and tried to unlock her door.

The guy didn't take a hint and continued attempting to unlock the door. Not too bright in my opinion because the woman kept stabbing him. The article says the "attack" went on for about an hour and a half until the intruder passed out and the woman called police.

The officer was quoted as saying, “What do you tell your friends in county jail, where did you get those wounds? I don't know that he's going to tell them he got them from a 95-year-old lady confined to a wheel chair."

There's a video from KTUL Channel 8 HERE. There's a commercial at the beginning, but it's worth the wait!

Some of the comments on other sites are a hoot!


  • And now he is awl screwed up...

  • Age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill.

  • As experienced burglars go, you wouldn’t say this guy was a Craftsman...

  • Foghorn Leghorn: I say I say the boy's about as sharp as a bowling ball.

And my personal favorite:

That’s the woman I want answering the phone at 3 AM!!!